Saturday, November 22, 2008

Secret service steps up inauguration security - Confident Aren't they?

America hasn't elected Barack Obama President of the U.S. YET.

Yes, we voted. Yes, Obama won the election.

But the President of the United States isn't elected by the American people and never has been.

He (or she someday) is elected by the Electoral College on December 15th.

When we vote in our Presidential election on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, we are electing only electors. We elect one elector for each senator and representative our state has in Congress. Washington, D.C. gets electors, but no more than the least populous state.

On the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December, the electors meet at their state capitals to elect the President of the United States. They vote separately for the President and the Vice President.

The results (sealed) are then sent to Congress for the votes to be counted in a joint session of the houses on the 6th day of January in the next calendar year. It is held at 1:00PM in the Chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Until that time, no one actually knows who is going to be our next President and Vice President! The President and Vice President are sworn in two weeks later.

The reason no one really notices this is that the electors have pledged to vote the way their electoral districts or states (it varies) have told them to vote. So they tend to elect the same candidates that the American people have voted for.

24 states have laws to punish electors who do not vote as pledged but there are no laws FORCING them to vote that way.

If the electors can't agree, then the House and Senate pick our President and Vice President. They've done so three times. The House has chosen our President twice, 1801 and 1825. The Senate chose the Vice President in 1837.

Should the House not be able to choose a President, then the current Vice President (Dick Cheney in this case) becomes our new President until the House picks one. If there is no choice of Vice President, then the Speaker of the House (currently Nancy Pelosi) becomes Vice President.

Now, back to the Electoral College. There is nothing to stop them from choosing Joe Biden as President and Barack Obama as Vice President. Heck, they could choose to elect ME as President and YOU as Vice President if they wished. We don't even have to have expressed an interest in politics.

As the old saying goes, don't count your chickens before they are hatched. Here they are, Obama picking his cabinet, the Secret Service setting up the most secure inauguration in history (I think that they think Obama's race might make him a target) yet there is a very slim chance that Obama could end up watching the inauguration on a TV set in his hotel room wondering "What the F**K happened?"

I'd love to see that happen, though it'd cause riots in the streets as that seems to be the way the majority of Obama supporters express their disapproval with jury verdicts and the like. And to be fair, everyone else that voted for Obama would probably riot as well as most of America has never bother to learn how the election system REALLY works. So they'd wrongly protest "But WE elected Obama!"

If the Electoral College was to do this, I hope they at least pick someone good. Like maybe Ron Paul for President and perhaps Tina Fey for Vice President.

CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time - Blogs from CNN.com: "Secret service steps up inauguration security
Posted: 04:55 PM ET

As many as 4 million people are expected to attend Obama's inauguration at the Mall.

WASHINGTON (AP) – Law enforcement officials bracing for the largest crowds in inaugural history are preparing far-reaching security — thousands of video cameras, sharpshooters, air patrols — to safeguard President-elect Barack Obama's swearing-in."



(Via CNN Politcal Ticker.)



Technorati Tags:
, , , ,


Monday, November 17, 2008

Time For Detroit to Reap What it Has Sewn

You've all ready about it, heard about and possibly discussed it. The big three U.S. automakers are asking for a bailout with our tax dollars.

Used as ammunition to get the money, GM for instance is falling back on the old saying "What's good for GM is good for America". But is that the truth?

Granted, the bankruptcy of such a major former blue chip company will ripple through the industry. Thousands of companies provide services or parts to GM, Ford and Chrysler. They really have no other markets.

The employees of those companies will lose their jobs, the money they would have spent won't go into the cash registers of many more thousands of businesses.

The fall of GM alone could cause the unemployment of over one million people on the United States.

So if we fail to bail out GM, they tell us that it'll be more expensive when we have to pay for their funeral.

Is that true?

toiletmoney.jpg

What has happened to get Detroit to this point?

Thirty some years ago, the Arab Oil Embargo "caused" gasoline shortages. The American people flocked to the dealers to buy more fuel efficient cars. Since Detroit had nothing to offer, Toyota, Datsun (now known as Nissan), Volkswagon and even Honda suddenly had a new market.

Detroit continued to make large vehicles knowing that once prices went down, their market would return. But their lack of preparedness gave those other companies a strong beachhead in the U.S. market.

From the mid-70s through the 1980s foreign cars became more reliable, better built and became more and more acceptable to American buyers. Meanwhile, Detroit's offerings were going downhill. Some of the worst vehicles I ever had to work on or use were Chryslers and GM products of the 80s. Anybody remember the Chrysler K car? The Ford Fairmont? Or driving a 1978 Chevy pickup on the freeway and watching the front fenders flex and flap? I do.

In the past thirty years, Detroit has done little to plan ahead other than in how to gouge the buyer. Did you know that there are some current cars from the big three where to change the battery, a hole has to be cut in the wheel well? That's right, you can't just go to Sears or Pepboys, buy a battery, remove the cables from the old one, swap them out and reconnect. Need to replace the $5 oil pan gasket on your Northstar equipped Cadillac? Well, I'm sure the gasket is more than $5 but you get the idea. Anyway, you have to remove the engine!

Meanwhile, executive bonuses and pay are higher and higher, as are the wages of the workers on the factory floor. According to one of GM's statements, they plan on new hires (untrained workers) getting only $14 an hour instead of the current $29 an hour they get now.

That's right... fresh out of high school kids were hired at big three auto plants making 50% more than my wife made as a nurse with 40 years of experience.

Now what does Detroit want the money for? GM wants at least $10 Billion (yes billion) just to cover the pension fund, and another $10 Billion to fund designing more fuel efficient cars. They MIGHT even close some of their plants in Mexico and bring more of the manufacturing of American cars back to America. But there are no guarantees on that.

Compare that to Honda. They are opening several new plants in the U.S. this year and next. They've revamped all of their plants so that they can quickly switch manufacturing over to whatever the public wants to buy. Quickly being in the range of six months to a year, while the big three need three years lead time to switch.

Do you think that the Big Three have learned their lessons?

We taxpayers bailed out Chrysler once before. As a result, people who bought Chrysler stock cheap made millions over ten years. We taxpayers were paid back by Chrysler providing our government with those K cars. (What a deal) Now Chrysler is in the toilet again and wanting another bailout.

My firm belief is that any money we give Detroit will only put them on life support. At some point they are going to die anyway.

So it's pay for their funeral, or give them billions and then pay for the funeral anyway.

I say "screw them". They made their bed, yes people will suffer if they fold. But the suffering will be less in the long run if we pull the plug now.

Perhaps whomever buys the assets of a bankrupt Ford, Chrysler or GM will run things more efficiently. They could certainly use the Japanese companies as inspiration.

Auto bailout debate: What's at stake - Nov. 17, 2008: "NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- For more than a century, the U.S. auto industry has been at the center of the American industrial economy. Events over the next month could determine if that remains the case.

This week, Congress will consider whether to cough up billions of dollars to bail out the troubled companies."



(Via CNN Money.)



Technorati Tags:
, , ,