Tuesday, June 21, 2011

A Real World Comparison of Verizon vs Sprint

With both Gizmodo and C/Net reporting the July 7 death of Verizon unlimited data plans , I decided to take another look at Verizon.

Disclaimer: I used Verizon for many, many years.  I left them for Sprint because I was tired of them crippling phones to force us to use their services (picture uploads, ringtones, etc.) and their lack of a data plan.  In my opinion, Verizon had decided to market solely to teens.  I'm on my 4th or 5th two year Sprint contract now, have just as good connectivity, no billing issues, etc.

Ok, let me tell you where I am with Sprint as that'll be my baseline for looking at Verizon.

My account currently has three lines.

  1. My HTC EVO 4G WiMax Android phone, $350 after rebate with a two year contract.  This was just over a year ago.
  2. My wife's Samsung flip phone, free with a two year contract as of last month.
  3. My Dell 11Z notebook with integrated 3G/4G WiMax, $150 with a two year data contract as of last month

My EVO plan is $90 a month plus tax.  That includes 450 "Anytime" minutes, unlimited nights and weekends, unlimited mobile-to-mobile minutes, unlimited texting and unlimited 4G data.  3G data is limited to 5GB a month.  I also get some kind of bonus of 300 Anytime minutes.  I'm not sure what that entails but it sounds like I actually get 750 "Anytime" minutes a month.

To get the same plan from Verizon would also be $90 a month.  With the caveat that unlimited data plans will no longer be available after July 6th.  So instead of $30 a month for unlimited data, it'll be $30 for 10GB of data.  The second caveat is that instead of unlimited mobile-to-mobile, you only get unlimited Verizon-to-Verizon, though you can add up to five out of network numbers to talk to free if you boost to a 900+ minute plan..

Now even I probably don't use 10GB a month on my mobile devices.  It is hard to say because since 4G is unlimited use, my 4G data usage isn't tracked (or at least not where I can see it). As for 3G, I'll use about 250MB this month extrapolating what I've used so far, 2/3rds into my billing period.

So as it currently stands with unlimited data plans, Sprint and Verizon are a tie for my EVO.

My wife rarely leaves the house as she's now retired and enjoying being "just" a house mouse.  However, I insist that she carry a cell phone "just in case".  She's on Sprint's least expensive plan... 200 "Anytime" minutes a month with unlimited nights and weekends.  She doesn't text, do phone based email or anything web related.  The camera might as well not be in there either.

With Verizon, this same plan is $40 a month, though in a few years when she turns 65, Verizon will charge her the same as Sprint does now.

As for the Dell 11z? My Sprint data plan is $65 a month for unlimited 4G use and 5GB of 3G use.  With regards to hardware, Verizon offers nothing similar.  The closest thing they offer is a USB modem for your existing notebook.

While Verizon offers a number of USB modems ranging from free for a reconditioned one to $50, the user ratings on them are pretty bad with the exception of the free one.  Worse though is the data plan.  Even now you can't get an unlimited data plan.  Instead, You're going to pay $50 a month for up to 5GB of usage, or $80 for up to 10GB of usage.

Bottom Line:  For me to have the equivalent setup with Verizon, it would cost me about $25 a month more than with Sprint.  Instead of unlimited data, I'd have limits.  I see no compelling reason for me to switch to Verizon.  Not even the iPhone 4, iPad 2 or Xoom 3G.

 

 

Friday, June 17, 2011

How Screw Up An App Store

Making good app stores are easy. Apple showed the way with the iTunes Music Store cum bookstore cum app store cum Blockbuster clone cum whatever-they-think-of-next.

Yes, there were online "stores" offering apps long before Apple.  Tucows.com was the first one I used on regular basis maybe fifteen years ago.  There were several I used like Handango for Windows Mobile 5/6.  They worked, but the user interface usually left a lot to be desired.

So along comes Apple expanding the iTunes Music Store into an app store for the iPhone as well.  And they did a great job.  Easy to search, easy to find what you want, good descriptions, screenshots, customer reviews, integrated buying, etc. etc.

Google's Android Market and Amazon's Android App Store are very good Just-different-enough clones so their stores are easy to use as well.

Since Apple set the standard for mobile app stores, when they released the Apple App Store for OS X, I expected a similar service.

Well, we pretty much got it.  However, let's look at the things that I feel that Apple not only didn't do right, but screwed up.

MarsEdit.  That's the OS X program I've been using for years to write blog entries.  The only app even close to MarsEdit on ANY OS is Windows Live Writer for, well, Windows.

MarsEdit is available on the Apple App Store.  For those who buy it from the App store, they're notified of updates and get an easier install/upgrade.  Well, OK, Instead of clicking a link to download, having the DMG file mount and dragging the app to your applications folder... you just click the link and then double click the downloaded file.  Not much easier really but just go with it for now as I'm trying to find customer advantages with the app store.

Anyway, So there is MarsEdit sitting on the App store.  It currently has 4 out of 5 stars from 18 people having rated it.  Only 18?  The most used blogging software on the Mac?  Why?  Because only 18 people have purchased and rated MarsEdit from the Apple App Store since it opened.

Well, as you'll see, Apple, in either their ignorance or arrogance has assumed that no one ever purchased apps until THEY saw fit to give us an app store.

You can only rate an app IF you purchased it from the Apple App Store.  Never mind that you've purchased it and a dozen upgrades in the past twelve years.  If it didn't happen in the app store, it didn't happen.  So your opinion doesn't count.

Ok, I can see where that can help reduce the author/supporter of a competing app from leaving a one star review.  Then again, if it means that much to the scummy competitor... it might be worth the $10-$40 to buy this competing app just to give it a low rating.  That's why I say it'll "help reduce", not "eliminate".

So buy buying software and supporting the author before the app store existed, the app store does nothing for me as far as that software goes.

What if the author is now selling solely via the App Store?  I can no longer get upgrades unless I buy the app again.

Or how about this one.  I've been running the beta of Reeder for OS X since it came out. (Reeder is a very good news aggregator/rss reader that is better than the free NetNewsWire in some respects, worse in others.)

The beta has expired.  Now normally, I'd click the button to get a new copy... be taken to the author's website where I'd download and install a new version.  Since it already exists, I'd have to confirm the replacement. Since it is out of beta, I'd expect to get a "trial use" window with an option to buy/register the full version.

That's three clicks plus registration.  And I can even download to my Windows or Linux machine and transfer to and install it on the Mac later.

Here's what happens in reality:

  1. I click the button to get a new copy
  2. I'm sent to the author's website
  3. I find that there is no new copy to get.  Instead I have to click the button to go to the Apple App Store
  4. The Apple App Store Preview page comes up in my browser
  5. That launches the App Store app
  6. I click to buy Reeder
  7. I'm told that I can't buy it as a newer version (the expired beta) is installed on my computer.

I haven't even BOUGHT the durned thing yet and it's already more than twice the work of the old way.

Ok, so now I have go to the applications folder, delete the old copy and start over.

Ok, it's delete.  Oh NO! Hazel just popped up and I inadvertantly let it delete the data files for the Reeder I just deleted (Hazel is a great AppleScript thing that lives in my menu bar.  One of the things it does is to remove all of the junk files left behind when deleting an app.)

So no only do I start the purchase/download/install cycle again... but now I have to do a full setup of my news reader again.

In summary, there are three of the problems with the way Apple has set up the Apple App Store.

  1. If you bought it before the App Store existed, you don't count
  2. If the author moves solely to the app store, you don't count
  3. Updating can take double the effort than the normal 'old skool' way

Plus If the author later dumps the App Store, you're probably hosed for upgrades, etc. as well

Now... back to the Reeder app.

  • $10 for it on the App store.
  • NetNewsWire is free (with little ads showing)

 

  • Reeder supports Readability.
  • NetNewsWire allows me to clip directly to MarsEdit

$10 is a fair price.  Which will I use more, Readability or MarsEdit?

MarsEdit wins.  The fact that I save $10 and don't have to deal with the App Store is the clincher.

Sorry Reeder Author, you and Apple both lose.  You lose the sale, Apple loses their $3 cut.

 

 

Thursday, June 16, 2011

New Blog Site

For those who care, I have another blog I'm developing.  I'm hosting it on my own server and am using Wordress.  So far I really like Wordpress better than Blogger though they are both good.

It is pretty much a mirror of this one, though I think that it looks more professional.  It also has a lot of features that Blogger doesn't have.

One of the main reasons for the new site is to divide it up into more defined categories.   I want to put more emphasis on reviews of software and hardware, etc. while leaving an area for the more political and crotchety old man posts too.

Anyway, if you feel like it, please check out www.ineedit.com/ramblings.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Apple iTunes App Store Terms of Service Says They Can Harvest Your Organs!

Maybe not, but at 62 page or more and updated weekly, who's to say that it isn't buried in there somewhere?

If you have an IOS device... iPod Touch, iPhone or iPad, and have ever used the App store app, then you've had to agree to their Terms of Service and Privacy agreement.

Apple seems to update this on a weekly or more basis.  We find out when we go to download an app or to upgrade our apps when a box comes up telling us that Apple has changed the terms yet again and that we should read the entire thing.  We then have to agree to the new terms if we wish to continue the upgrade/downloads.

Now, I don't know about you, but at 62-65 pages each time, I'm not going to read all that legal BS each time.  I don't think anyone but Apple's lawyers have ever actually made it through the whole thing.

I choose to trust that Apple isn't going to screw me over.

OTOH, there's always this:  Some South Park episode scenes that pertain to this very subject.

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Looking for Service - A Lost Art?

Where is the personal touch in this  automated/impersonal/computer age?
  • It is wonderful to be able to go to an ATM at 3AM and withdraw cash.
  • Forgot to renew your auto insurance?  It is really nice to pop into a website, pay via credit/debit card and even download and printout your temporary insurance cards.
  • I love shopping on Amazon.com.  At 2AM I can read reviews from other customers, find the best bang for the buck, click my mouse and it is delivered in a day or two.
However, if there is a problem, or you have a question, most of the time you have few options:
  1. Call on the phone and hope that the person you get speaks English and that the question or problem is included in their script.
  2. Send off an email and wait for an answer that you HOPE is the one you need.
  3. If you're lucky, they have an "instant chat" feature.  Again, you have to hope that they understand your question or problem.  While the grammar isn't "American", at least you don't have to figure out their accent and poor English.
This same level of automation/lack of service/no human contact is invading our communities.  While banks have tried to replace tellers with ATMs for years and fast food restaurants put the soda machines on the customer's side of the counter and just hand you a cup, it is even in our stores.

Case in point:  I can go to Home Depot.  Walk in, go around and pick up what I need, check out through an automated checkout line where I do the scanning and bagging, pay and walk out.  Never once interacting with another human.

Granted, Home Depot still has friendly and knowledgable employees to answer questions and interact with, but for how much longer?

In "the old days", I'd go into the local hardware store and my purchases were a combination of things I'd pick up off the shelf and things a clerk got for me.  If I wanted a pound of nails, the clerk would weigh and bag a pound of them for me.  In most cases the clerk remembered my name and I knew theirs.

Once upon a time, you got groceries that way too.  You'd tell the grocer what you wanted, say 5 pounds of potatoes, and they pick them, bag and weigh them for you.  Then came the self-service super markets.  The customer picks, weighs and bags the groceries, then goes through check out to pay for them.

Remember full service gas stations?  There didn't used to be any self-service.  You'd pull up to the pump, driving over a hose that rang a bell and a real live person would come out, ask what type and how much gas you wanted.  Then, while you sat there, got out and stretched your legs, used the bathroom, looked at a map on the wall or bought a bottle of soda from the machine, the attendant filled your car, washed your windows, checked your oil, fan belt and tire pressure.  Finally, you'd return to your car, pay him (or sometimes her) and drive off refreshed, your tank full and the car vitals checked for the next leg of your trip.

This certainly doesn't sound like pulling up to a pump, swiping your card and pumping your own gas does it?

Remember the scene from "Back to the Future" where Michael J. Fox wakes up on a bench in the 50's and watches four or five guys in starched Texaco (I think) uniforms race up and start servicing a car that had just pulled in?    While there might not have been THAT much customer service, it is certainly better than swiping a card or slipping cash through a slot in a bullet-proof window to a bored clerk who is busy watching TV.

Humans are primates and primates or social animals.  We NEED human interaction or we go crazy.  Perhaps this explains some things about life today.

The reason for this post though is to point out what customer service is all about.  It DOES still exist today, but we have to go looking to find it.

I used to have Progressive as my insurance company.  In the time I had them, I only spoke to a human once, when a claims adjuster came to look at my bike after I was the victim of a hit and run.  Everything else, from application, to payments, to changes, etc. was all done at my convenience using my web browser.  My 30 year old son prefers this way of doing business.

My wife and her mother used to have Farmer's Insurance until the agency owner retired and turned it over to her daughter who soon ran off the customers.  For almost 30 years since, my wife had her insurance through AAA.

Now AAA was a pretty good company.  But we were just a customer number.  You'd never get the same agent on the phone twice.  Even at the local office, the faces changed on a regular basis.  Then there were a number of small paperwork mistakes.  Forgetting to apply a multi-policy discount, not sending a renewal notice or not following up to see why we hadn't renewed, etc.

The whole of my teen years and probably the next ten years or more after I left home, my folks had State Farm insurance through a local agency.  Harold Johnson State Farm in Sunnymead, California.  Harold was a family man.  I think his wife and daughter worked the agency with him.  He was "our insurance agent" until the day he retired.  If you called his office, you got one of two people, usually it was Harold.  He gave great personal service.  When I got married (the first time), as a wedding gift, he gave us the use of his vacation cabin in Idyllwild for a week.

I miss that level of personal service though most of our twenty-somethings have never experienced it.

While Linda and I have no claims, no tickets and are actually driving less, AAA raised our rates this again year.  So I went looking.  I applied on the net to one of those "fill it out once and we'll have a dozen companies give you quotes".

One of the quotes was going to a local State Farm agent, less than four miles from my house.  Well, I remembered Harold and the kind of service he gave so I got my hopes up.

Erica called me from the Jason Spronk State Farm Agency and after several discussions it was looking good.  So I took some time off of work for Linda and I go in, meet them and see if they were what we wanted.

I'd already told Linda that I'd be willing to pay more than AAA wanted, if I could get good service.

So far, it appears that Jason's agency is almost a clone of Harold Johnson's.  While it is in a strip mall type thing rather than an old converted bungalow, when you walk in, you almost feel like you're in someone's home office.  Jason has a very small office for himself, the larger front office has three or four desks that are occupied by his wife and an associate (Erica).  None of the furniture is for show.  It is all functional, decent quality and pretty much what you'd expect from a guy starting his own business. (Jason has been an agent for eleven years.)  I've been in offices where the owner/agent used expensive furnishings to try and impress the customer.  I get the feeling that in this office, it is the customer service that is used to impress.

And that is what we got.  Customer service.  Erica wasn't quite ready for us, so we spent a lot of time in Jason's office shooting the breeze and getting to know each other.  As he put it, "I'm applying for a job.  I want to be your agent."

With them, they'll know when a payment is due, a renewal is coming up, etc.  They'll call and/or email to remind me, use text messaging or even snail mail.  Whatever it takes to let me know that there is a problem.  Jason likes to meet with customers once a year to review their lives and insurance needs.  Yes, this may get him more residuals from premiums, but it also best serves his customers.  The job of an agent is primarily to make sure that their customers are protected.  Their pay for doing their job is getting a small amount of the insurance premium as income (residuals).

It worked.  Between, Jason and Erica, meeting Jason's wife Kari and their two daughters (no they aren't employees yet.)  Linda and I walked out with a new agent, better insurance coverage at only slightly more money and the feeling of satisfaction of find good people and making new friends.  We know that if we need advice or have a problem, there is someone just a phone call, email or short drive away that knows us and can help as opposed to the agent de jour on the phone in a cubicle in another state.
So real customer service and human interaction IS available.  You just have to look for it.  In Henderson, Nevada, one of those places is Jason Spronk State Farm Insurance.

Mr. Spronk sums it all up on his website in his mission statement: "Our Mission is to build relationships one at a time."

Monday, June 06, 2011

Apple - Another Walled Garden Problem

Is it a walled garden, or is it a prison?

The problem with being locked into the iTunes app store is that when Apple screws up, we are the ones being screwed.

Case in point: I'm using my wife's iPad, laying in bed and playing some Trade Nations. When I finished, I checked the app store for updates. There were two, both free updates for free apps (Dropbox was one) so I told it to update both. This is something that I've done a lot since I got this for my lovely wife last Christmas.

But instead of asking me for my ITMS login, it takes me to the app store to log in and check my billing information. Then it tells me that PayPal is "not accepted on this device.". WTF Apple?

1. You've always accepted PayPal from this device, my macs, my windows boxes as well as my iPod touch. I've been a registered Apple developer for years, including when it was $500 a year, not $99. So you obviously know who I am.

2. Most importantly, I'm updating FREE programs with FREE updates! So who gives a flying fig about PayPal being supported on this device?

You have me locked into your "benevolent dictatorship" so it isn't like I can go elsewhere for my apps. I'm serious though that the Android tablets That I've been eyeing are looking better and better.

The only thing I do on the iPad that I can't do on Android is play Trade Nations, UberRacer and Metal-storm. Every productivity and non-game entertainment app I use on the iPad or my iPod is also on my Android phone. Plus there are a number of nice apps on my phone that aren't available for IOS.

Keep screwing with us and you'll lose us. While I fully realize that the thousands of dollars I've spent are the tiniest of a fraction of your income, if enough of us switch, they'll all add up and Apple could end up being known as the Packard-Bell of the 21st century.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

.MAC/Mobile.Me/iCloud–Free For Now - Again

The more things change, the more that they stay the same.  Back when OS X first came out, it included a service called .MAC which allowed one to sync contacts, mail settings, bookmarks etc. between Apple computers which were running OS X.  Apple gave this to us at no charge as “a thank you for running OS X”.

Of course, a year or two later, once we’d all gotten used to the service and had our yourname@mac.com vanity email addresses out there, Apple dropped the bomb that “Oh by the way, we aren’t thankful any longer, now you have to pay $99 a year to keep using the .MAC service.”

And of course most of us paid.

Then, Apple decided to remake the .MAC service and changed the name to Mobile.Me.  Nothing really changed except the name and that the email addresses changed to yourname@me.com.  Thankfully, the mac.com addresses continue to work to this day.

Today, Steve Jobs admitted at WWDC that basically, Mobile.Me and $99 a year for the .MAC service was a flop for Apple.

So… introducing yet another rebranding of the same service… iCloud!  Free! (For now) Again.

There MAY be some new features coming to the .MAC err I mean Mobile.Me err I mean iCloud service.  That is assuming that Apple can get the music labels to go along and let Apple do what Amazon and Google are already doing, letting you store your music on their cloud.

In other news from Steve at WWDC, IOS 5 has no groundbreaking features… just things to make it more like Android.  Considering that about a year ago, Mr. Jobs was sneering as he pointed out that Apple OWN3D the Smartphone market and that a year later Android phones outsell iPhones… it is probably a good thing for Apple to try to catch up to Android.

And some good news though for folks waiting for Apple OS X 10.7 Lion.  As the rumors stated, it’ll be available next month, via the Apple App Store only and for just $29.  The price point is interesting as 10.6/Snow Leopard was $29 because Apple considered it to be an incremental upgrade rather than a major release.  Lion though, has more than enough new features for Apple to justify a $89 price tag.

Not that I’m complaining.

Thursday, May 12, 2011

Amazon Set to Compete Against the iPad

Cult of Mac reported recently that Jeff Bezos told Consumer Reports that there will be news coming about an Amazon branded "multipurpose tablet device".


Amazon already has the Kindle hardware eBook reader.


At the moment, Android tablets aren't a big threat to Apple. At the moment. Feature-wise, they are as good or superior. Where they suffer is that they don't have a library built over the past year of "HD" tablet optimized apps. That one year head start and a rabidly loyal fan base is what is keeping Apple with 80% of the tablet market.

My guess is that Android tablets will be a much bigger threat to the iPad a year from now. After all, most of the name-brand Android tablets are already on a par with the new iPad 2 as far as CPU, graphics, memory, camera and price are concerned. Add in things like USB ports, memory card support, spare battery capability, etc. and they are actually ahead of Apple.

Now, give the developers a year to write tablet optimized applications and all bets are off.

After all, just a year or so ago, Steve Jobs was smirking about how the Apple iPhone OWNED the smart phone market and that Android wasn't a threat. Mr. Jobs no longer says that. Multiple sources determined that Android now has about 30% of the smartphone market. Gartner and other industry forecasters predict a 50% market share next year.

So, if Android tablets follow the same path, the iPad is in for a rough time.

If the marketing powerhouse, Amazon.com, releases their own tablet, there is a VERY good chance that they will leap to the forefront of Android tablet sales and challenge Apple on their own turf.

Amazon has the marketing muscle, content connections and data infrastructure to go toe-to-toe with Apple and score a TKO.

p.s. Wiping off my crystal ball, here's a prediction. With the loss of being the exclusive USA iPhone carrier, watch for AT&T to partner with Amazon as the exclusive data network for the Amazon tablet. OK, that was obvious, since the Kindle's Whispernet is carried by AT&T.

So... look for the Amazon Android 4G phone on AT&T as well.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Why Are the Feds Even Involved In The First Place? Union Welfare?

Top Republicans demand Obama weigh in on Boeing dispute – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs:

In a nutshell

  • Boeing has almost finished another huge plant in South Carolina to build their new 787 Dreamliner planes.
  • South Carolina is a "Right to Work" state (Right to work means employees can't be forced to join a union).
  • One of the unions representing employees at Boeing's Washington plants went to the National Labor Relations Board. complaining that Boeing put the new plant in South Carolina as retaliation for all the times that the union called for a strike against Boeing.
  • Now the National Labor Relations Board is telling Boeing that they can't have their plant in South Carolina.

So we have a Federal agency basically telling a company that they may only have plants in the 38 states that force employees to join a union.

Why?

Is the NLRB concerned the Boeing will treat South Carolina employees poorly?  Boeing already has at least one plant in South Carolina making and assembling portions of the 787.  Do they have a poor record at those plants?

Perhaps the NRLB is concerned that corporations run amok in right to work states.

South Carolina has aerospace plants owned by General Electric, Honeywell, 3D Systems and Lockheed Martin.  They have BMW's only North American factory as well as plants owned by Daimler, Bosch, Bridgestone and more.  The list of factories and plants in South Carolina is a virtual who's-who of big industry.

So why can't Boeing have another plant there?

Is it to protect South Carolina works from slave driver corporations?

Is it to protect Boeing competitors who're in South Carolina?

Or is it to protect this particular union?

Note: Unions aren't banned in right to work states.  Nevada is a right to work state yet the two most powerful lobbying groups in this state are the teacher's and culinary unions.  Right to work means that employees can't be forced to join the union, it doesn't prevent them from joining.

Obviously, if membership in the union in question is a benefit to their members, then employees in South Carolina would be flocking to join. If the South Carolina Boeing employees aren't joining the union, then perhaps they have a good reason.

And to repeat, why is the NRLB even involved?  Since when does the Federal government have authority to tell a corporation that it can't have another plant in a state where they already have one?  Since when does the Federal government have authority to tell a company where they may have facilities?

Unions don't have this authority, nor should they.  For a union to get the NRLB to restrain Boeing is simply and purely union pandering by the NRLB and yet another intrusion on States Rights, an example of anti-business practices and union welfare.

 

Disclaimer: This blog post was created using MarsEdit on my MacBook Pro. I love the combination of quality hardware and software that is stable and functional while making things easy to get things done. All original content is copyright ©2008-2011 by Rick Cross, all rights reserved.

Thursday, May 05, 2011

Apple Decides 3rd Party Apps Are Filled With Smut!

Frequent/Intense Realistic Violence, Frequent/Intense Alcohol, Tobacco, or Drug Use or References, Frequent/Intense Sexual Content or Nudity, Frequent/Intense Profanity or Crude Humor, Frequent/Intense Mature/Suggestive Themes, Frequent/Intense Horror/Fear Themes, Frequent/Intense Cartoon or Fantasy Violence

Wow! Sounds like a real scumbag app huh?  Except that is the warning for "readMe" which is described as "Simple yet crisp clean and competitive eBook reader for iPad, iPhone and iPod touch with EPUB, FB2 and PDF support."

Yes, an eBook reader identical in function to Apple's own iBooks app.  Both are eBook readers capable of reading any eBook in a supported format that you can download or buy.

Imagine going to buy a television set and being told that you had to be over 17 because the set MIGHT be used to view shows not suited for children, even though you only want to watch your new 70th Anniversary Edition The Wizard of Oz on Blu-ray.  Then again, a number of the warnings above would apply to this movie.

I'd guess that Apple is covering their corporate butts because the customer MAY decide to download a book not suitable for children.  Based on the way Apple does this, I'd have to assume that iBooks has a built-in censor to stop you from reading Lady Chatterly's Lover, Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer, Stephen King books, etc.  I have to assume this because Apple doesn't apply such rules to iBooks, Safari, etc.

That's right, Safari as the 3rd party web browser, Opera comes with a similar warning.   In fact, I've noticed these "rules" on a lot of 3rd party browsers and other apps which may freely display content of the customer's choice from the internet.  But those "rules" never appear on Apple products, only on 3rd party products which compete with Apple products.

ReadMe for iPhone iPod touch and iPad on the iTunes App Store 1

Tuesday, May 03, 2011

Superman Renounces U.S. Citizenship

One of the oldest "living" illegal aliens in America is going to  renounce his U.S. Citizenship.  When did he become a citizen?  I must have missed that in the storyline.

Superman Renounces U.S. Citizenship in 'Action Comics' #900 - ComicsAlliance | Comic book culture, news, humor, commentary, and reviews: ""

 

Disclaimer: This blog post was created using MarsEdit on my MacBook Pro. I love the combination of quality hardware and software that is stable and functional while making things easy to get things done. All original content is copyright ©2008-2011 by Rick Cross, all rights reserved.

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Those Americans Are At It Again

You've probably seen the headlines from major news services where the FBI shut down three "illegal" internet poker sites yesterday and stated that they were committing bank fraud and money laundering.
For those who didn't actually read the stories, here's what happened.
All the FBI has actually accomplished is to arrest three US Citizens and to seize five internet domain names.  The sites are still up and running for the rest of the world.
As for the rest of the story:

Wednesday, March 02, 2011

IPad2: Thinner, Lighter, faster and two cameras. That's it, No Need to Rush

First thing, it was good seeing Steve Jobs up there on the stage.  He looked pretty good for a guy with only six weeks to live.
I only wanted two things in the iPad 2:  more storage and a faster processor.  Well, we got the faster processor.  With flash memory prices dropping so much in the past year, I seriously expected that Apple would double the storage, giving us something like a choice of 32G, 64G and 128G models.
Even if you don't care about the iPad, if you have any interest in tablet devices, we have to watch what Apple is doing.  While others sold functional pad computers before Apple began designing the iPad, it was Apple's use of the stripped down OS that made it reliable.  It was the 3rd party developers who wrote apps that took advantage of the good things about IOS while working around the bad things that made the iPad popular.
This meant that anyone else wanting to compete in the tablet/pad arena has to outdo Apple.  So there is the big interest.  What would Apple do to the iPad to leap ahead of the competition again?

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Barack Obama 'considering all appropriate actions' = Speech or Troops?

Libya, world reacts to Saif Gadhafi's address - CNN.com: "The same source confirmed that President Barack Obama was monitoring the situation in Libya and 'considering all appropriate actions.'"
Umm and those would be exactly what?
According to some very old and musty document that is supposed to be the rules for our Federal Government, our President is allowed to be the Commander-In-Chief of our Federal troops, can grant pardons and reprieves for offenses against the United States, make treaties (with the approval of the U.S. Senate), appoint Ambassadors, Supreme Court Justices, etc. (all contingent upon the approval of the U.S. Senate), give State of the Union speeches to Congress and recommend to Congress laws that he'd like to see passed.

iPad Envy: Flood of Android Tablets vs iPad - But Is the Competition Better Than iPad?

A whole slew of Android 10" tablets have been announced and are starting to ship, with a lot more due over the rest of this year.  Many offer enhancements of the original iPad, 16x9 screens optimized for movies, USB ports, SD card slots, cameras, etc.  The question is, since they are playing catch-up, can they manage to do BETTER than the iPad rather than just equal it?

Saturday, February 12, 2011

My How Things Have Changed

I just picked up a Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex Desk.  That's an external hard drive with a 2TB (2,000 gigabytes) that cost just $99 and change at Costco.  It is quiet, reasonably fast and could be faster if I replaced the USB 2.0 interface with the optional Firewire 800, USB 3.0 or eSata interfaces.

Anyway, thinking of how large this is, especially for the price made me remember my first hard drives.

I was thrilled to get a 40MB external hard drive for my Amiga A1000.  I think it was about US$400 at the time.

My first PC Clone had a 30MB internal hard drive, and I saved for a long time to buy the 112MB 5.25" full height RLL hard drive that I used for data storage.

Now I look at some of the stuff I'm putting on the drive... a back issue of a magazine in PDF format that takes up 50MB of space.  It wouldn't have even fit on my first Amiga hard drive. Now I carry a thumb drive in my pocket that'd hold 26 YEARS worth of those issues.  The new GoFlex would hold over 3,300 years worth of the magazine!

The box shows that it'll hold 400,000 pictures from a 10 megapixel camera (mine is 7.1), 500,000 average MP3 music files or 240 hours of HD video.

Damn!

As a footnote, I'll point out that it has been decades since I got a new hard drive and said "I'll NEVER be able to fill that."